How is Coaching affected by your personality?

21 Apr 2011

Everyone has an ego, and this can and does have a big impact on how we conduct ourselves, our communications and our relationships. They also influence our attitudes and how we relate to both the outer world and to our inner world of thoughts and feelings.

As a consequence, we also take our egos into any coaching relationships – both as the coach and as coachee.

The coaching subjects all have their own egos to work with and most of them fit in towards the middle of a normal distribution curve of attitudes and behaviours – neither with over-inflated egos, nor with overwhelming anxiety and uncertainty. If there is any tendency towards the extremes, then people are more likely to be somewhat uncertain and lacking in confidence. In these situations, part of the coaching work is about helping them to build their confidence to an appropriate level and to help them to deal with more assertive people and those who are difficult to work with. Sometimes difficulties exist for coachees with their line managers who may not understand them or who may even have their own swollen egos to deal with.

Coaching a person with a big ego provides its own unique challenges varying from person to person. The positive aspect of a big ego is that the person is usually very interested in themselves and in their own success. The potential downside however is that sometimes this type of person wants a lot of stroking from their coach and they may not be very realistic and self-aware. Giving these people objective and useful feedback is part of the challenge and so is the role of challenging itself. Quite often they don’t like the idea of them having weaknesses or development areas to reflect and act upon. One way to get this aspect across to strong people is to talk about “over played” strengths becoming weaknesses and inhibiting performance. This approach can help them to accept the message and for the feedback to become acceptable and actionable.

Sometimes in a coaching assignment, it becomes apparent that the requirements of this type of coaching relationship are not consistent with the person’s view of themselves and of their world. In such cases it is sensible to agree to discontinue the work. The requirements of openness, looking inwards at oneself, admitting to vulnerabilities and taking the responsibility for producing and implementing an action plan that may include behaviour change, is sometimes a step too far for these people.

Coaches must also consider their own egos. No one can deny that we have them but we need to be able to put them to one side if we are to truly focus on the needs of the coachees. A coach is there to listen to, support and challenge people to work on their real issues and objectives – not to massage our own egos or self-importance. All too often in the arena of sport, we can see the ego of the team's coach or “manager” being placed ahead of the needs and achievements of the team – particularly when success arrives!

One aspect of this coaching role that is particularly challenging is the use of experiences or any anecdotes from my past which may be helpful to prompt new thoughts for the coachee, or give them the confidence to deal with an important issue for them. In sharing personal experiences and vulnerabilities as a coach, it is sensible to check that it is being done for the benefit of the coachee, and not for the benefit of the coach.

Keeping in mind that the success of anyone being coached is their success rather than the success of the coach is an important aspect to bear in mind.